Published: June 2024

Last updated: June 2024

‘It’s All About Layers’: Painting the Picture of Health Inequalities for Health Technology Assessment

INTRODUCTION: Health inequalities can be described as avoidable, systematic and unjust differences in health between different groups within society. This research described and evaluated potential methods to measure impacts of health inequalities that could be used in health technology assessment (HTA) in the UK. The research included recommendations for current and future policy objectives relating to incorporating health inequalities.

METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify methodological approaches used to incorporate health inequalities in HTA. Stakeholder interviews and a workshop were conducted with a range of UK stakeholders. This engagement aimed to discuss any gaps in the literature, and consider if attitudes, methods and policies were evolving at the same rate as the literature. Other aims of the engagement included the reflection of stakeholder views on health inequalities and better understanding the perspectives of decision makers.

RESULTS: Five potential methods were identified to account for health inequalities, with equity-based weighting and distributional cost-effectiveness analysis considered the most feasible of the methods for quantification. Stakeholders reiterated that a deliberative process should remain the centre of HTA. Stakeholders also raised issues such as the burden on committees, trade-offs between complexity and accessibility, and the importance of measuring the size and direction of inequality impacts. Recommendations were then produced based on these findings to better account for inequalities in HTA, highlighting the importance of combining a range of approaches.

CONCLUSIONS: Both companies and HTA agencies should be more proactive in accounting for health inequalities. Companies should be encouraged to provide quantitative analysis on health inequalities, while decision makers should be trained on new methods. Despite the recent rise in quantitative methods, qualitative methods remain extremely important for a ‘layered’ approach to considering health inequalities.

You may also be interested in

Peer-reviewed publication

Mitigating Bias in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Estimation Due to Missing Data: A Simulation-Based Study Evaluating Imputation Methods

YHEC authors: Joe Moss, Neil Hansell, Erin Barker, Matthew Taylor
Publication date: August 2026
Publishers: MDPI
Journal: Health Economics & Policy

Abstract

Missing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) data in clinical studies risk propagating bias into health technology assessments (HTAs) and cost-utility analyses. Despite this, current National Institute for Health and Care...

Peer-reviewed publication

Cost-Effectiveness of Maternal RSVpreF Vaccination Compared with Newborn Nirsevimab RSV Prophylaxis or No RSV Prophylaxis in Switzerland

YHEC authors: Amy Dymond, Stuart Mealing, Charlotte Graham
Publication date: August 2026
Journal: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: RSVpreF is a vaccine that immunises against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a seasonal respiratory virus, that can lead to lower respiratory tract infections. In Switzerland, RSVpreF is indicated for...

Peer-reviewed publication

Eliciting Health State Utilities for Open Wounds in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

YHEC authors: Damian Lewis, Adam B. Smith, Andria Joseph
Publication date: July 2026
Journal: Quality of Life Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: Qualitative accounts and studies employing disease-specific outcome measures have demonstrated that people with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) display impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to wound-related challenges. There...