Published: September 2025

Last updated: September 2025

From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Statistics to Improve Healthcare Decision-Making

Health economics is an important field not just in the UK but globally. Decision-makers can use it to prioritise resources used in healthcare systems to maximise population health whilst ensuring value for money. Since 1999, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has been responsible for these decisions in the UK. There is a need to provide these decision-makers with the best possible evidence for new treatments to support well-informed decisions.

The vast majority of health economic modelling is still conducted using Markov models to capture disease progression. However, these models rely on restrictive assumptions that may not accurately capture real-world disease progression. This talk will discuss two examples from a recent publication
where regression modelling was used to improve the health economic model. The first example will cover using a multinomial logistic regression to predict the changes in haemoglobin health states over time in patients with chronic kidney disease. Traditional Markov models assume a fixed disease progression rate which fails to account for patient subgroups and time-varying rates. Regression models enable dynamic transitions based on patient characteristics like age, sex, and baseline haemoglobin levels. This leads to better modelling of disease progression and subsequent decision-making.

The second example will cover using a generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) to estimate drug doses for each haemoglobin health state whilst adjusting for subgroup characteristics. This allows for a more granular approach to cost-effectiveness analysis. Unlike Markov models, which often require simplifying assumptions to capture drug doses, a GLMM better reflects the uncertainty in the target-population.

As real-world evidence and individual patient data (IPD) become more accessible, alongside increasing computational power, statisticians must apply and share advanced modelling approaches. By doing so, we can enhance healthcare decision-making, ultimately leading to better policies and improved population health.

You may also be interested in

Peer-reviewed publication

Methods in Systematic Reviews of Health Economic Evaluations in Submissions to Health Technology Assessment Agencies: How Systematic Are They, and Does This Matter?

YHEC authors: Chris Bartlett, Rachael McCool, Matthew Taylor
Publication date: October 2026
Journal: PharmacoEconomics

Abstract

Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations (SR-HEEs) are perceived as mandatory components of the health technology assessment (HTA) process in many jurisdictions. However, HTA agencies vary in how they prescribe...

Peer-reviewed publication

Commentary: Selpercatinib versus Multi-Kinase Inhibitors for Advanced Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of RET-Targeted Therapies

YHEC authors: Joe Moss, Erin Barker
Publication date: October 2026
Journal: Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

We have read with great interest the published network meta-analysis (NMA) by Wang et al. (2026) in Frontiers in Endocrinology, which synthesised available randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence to evaluate...

Peer-reviewed publication

Economic and Health Impact of Integrating Smoking Cessation Services into NHS Cancer Care Pathways in England: A Modelling Study

YHEC authors: Sam Harper, Ellen Telfer-Thomas, Robert Malcolm
Publication date: September 2026
Publishers: Elsevier
Journal: Lancet Regional Health - Europe

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that smoking post-diagnosis negatively impacts cancer outcomes. This study aimed to assess the health and cost impacts of introducing smoking cessation services at cancer diagnosis for...