Published: June 2024

Last updated: June 2024

‘It’s All About Layers’: Painting the Picture of Health Inequalities for Health Technology Assessment

INTRODUCTION: Health inequalities can be described as avoidable, systematic and unjust differences in health between different groups within society. This research described and evaluated potential methods to measure impacts of health inequalities that could be used in health technology assessment (HTA) in the UK. The research included recommendations for current and future policy objectives relating to incorporating health inequalities.

METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify methodological approaches used to incorporate health inequalities in HTA. Stakeholder interviews and a workshop were conducted with a range of UK stakeholders. This engagement aimed to discuss any gaps in the literature, and consider if attitudes, methods and policies were evolving at the same rate as the literature. Other aims of the engagement included the reflection of stakeholder views on health inequalities and better understanding the perspectives of decision makers.

RESULTS: Five potential methods were identified to account for health inequalities, with equity-based weighting and distributional cost-effectiveness analysis considered the most feasible of the methods for quantification. Stakeholders reiterated that a deliberative process should remain the centre of HTA. Stakeholders also raised issues such as the burden on committees, trade-offs between complexity and accessibility, and the importance of measuring the size and direction of inequality impacts. Recommendations were then produced based on these findings to better account for inequalities in HTA, highlighting the importance of combining a range of approaches.

CONCLUSIONS: Both companies and HTA agencies should be more proactive in accounting for health inequalities. Companies should be encouraged to provide quantitative analysis on health inequalities, while decision makers should be trained on new methods. Despite the recent rise in quantitative methods, qualitative methods remain extremely important for a ‘layered’ approach to considering health inequalities.

You may also be interested in

Peer-reviewed publication

A Disease Progression Model Comparing the Long-Term Mobility and Respiratory Outcomes of Adults with Late-Onset Pompe Disease Receiving Cipaglucosidase Alfa Plus Miglustat versus Alglucosidase Alfa

YHEC authors: Amy Dymond, Will Green
Publication date: July 2026
Journal: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Abstract

AIM: Late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is a rare lysosomal disease primarily impacting muscle strength andrespiratory function. LOPD has a substantial burden despite the availability of alglucosidase alfa (alg). Patients often...

Peer-reviewed publication

Addressing Real-World Data Gaps: Estimating the UK Population Cost of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Using A Flexible Cost-of-Illness Model Informed by the Optimal Patient Journey and IBDUK Patient Survey 2023

YHEC authors: Rachael MacDonald, Nick Hex, Barbara Uzdzinska, Jessica Pocock
Publication date: July 2026
Journal: BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), are chronic conditions affecting around 500,000 people in the UK and carries rising prevalence and substantial economic...

Peer-reviewed publication

Next Generation Methods in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): Need, Rigor, and Implementability

YHEC authors: Melissa Pegg
Publication date: July 2026
Journal: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Healthcare

Abstract

The Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) 2025 annual meeting featured three main plenaries to explore next generation (NextGen) evidence in health technology assessment (HTA). In this commentary we capture the...