Published: June 2024

Last updated: June 2024

‘It’s All About Layers’: Painting the Picture of Health Inequalities for Health Technology Assessment

INTRODUCTION: Health inequalities can be described as avoidable, systematic and unjust differences in health between different groups within society. This research described and evaluated potential methods to measure impacts of health inequalities that could be used in health technology assessment (HTA) in the UK. The research included recommendations for current and future policy objectives relating to incorporating health inequalities.

METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify methodological approaches used to incorporate health inequalities in HTA. Stakeholder interviews and a workshop were conducted with a range of UK stakeholders. This engagement aimed to discuss any gaps in the literature, and consider if attitudes, methods and policies were evolving at the same rate as the literature. Other aims of the engagement included the reflection of stakeholder views on health inequalities and better understanding the perspectives of decision makers.

RESULTS: Five potential methods were identified to account for health inequalities, with equity-based weighting and distributional cost-effectiveness analysis considered the most feasible of the methods for quantification. Stakeholders reiterated that a deliberative process should remain the centre of HTA. Stakeholders also raised issues such as the burden on committees, trade-offs between complexity and accessibility, and the importance of measuring the size and direction of inequality impacts. Recommendations were then produced based on these findings to better account for inequalities in HTA, highlighting the importance of combining a range of approaches.

CONCLUSIONS: Both companies and HTA agencies should be more proactive in accounting for health inequalities. Companies should be encouraged to provide quantitative analysis on health inequalities, while decision makers should be trained on new methods. Despite the recent rise in quantitative methods, qualitative methods remain extremely important for a ‘layered’ approach to considering health inequalities.

You may also be interested in

Peer-reviewed publication

Reducing Opioid Use for Chronic Pain With a Group-Based Intervention: Economic Evaluation using Randomised Controlled Trial Data

YHEC authors: Joe Moss
Publication date: October 2026
Journal: Addiction

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Long-term strong opioid use for chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) represents a significant public health challenge, associated with reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and increased mortality. The...

Peer-reviewed publication

Methods in Systematic Reviews of Health Economic Evaluations in Submissions to Health Technology Assessment Agencies: How Systematic Are They, and Does This Matter?

YHEC authors: Chris Bartlett, Rachael McCool, Matthew Taylor
Publication date: October 2026
Journal: PharmacoEconomics

Abstract

Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations (SR-HEEs) are perceived as mandatory components of the health technology assessment (HTA) process in many jurisdictions. However, HTA agencies vary in how they prescribe...

Peer-reviewed publication

Commentary: Selpercatinib versus Multi-Kinase Inhibitors for Advanced Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of RET-Targeted Therapies

YHEC authors: Joe Moss, Erin Barker
Publication date: October 2026
Journal: Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

We have read with great interest the published network meta-analysis (NMA) by Wang et al. (2026) in Frontiers in Endocrinology, which synthesised available randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence to evaluate...