Published: June 2024

Last updated: June 2024

‘It’s All About Layers’: Painting the Picture of Health Inequalities for Health Technology Assessment

INTRODUCTION: Health inequalities can be described as avoidable, systematic and unjust differences in health between different groups within society. This research described and evaluated potential methods to measure impacts of health inequalities that could be used in health technology assessment (HTA) in the UK. The research included recommendations for current and future policy objectives relating to incorporating health inequalities.

METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify methodological approaches used to incorporate health inequalities in HTA. Stakeholder interviews and a workshop were conducted with a range of UK stakeholders. This engagement aimed to discuss any gaps in the literature, and consider if attitudes, methods and policies were evolving at the same rate as the literature. Other aims of the engagement included the reflection of stakeholder views on health inequalities and better understanding the perspectives of decision makers.

RESULTS: Five potential methods were identified to account for health inequalities, with equity-based weighting and distributional cost-effectiveness analysis considered the most feasible of the methods for quantification. Stakeholders reiterated that a deliberative process should remain the centre of HTA. Stakeholders also raised issues such as the burden on committees, trade-offs between complexity and accessibility, and the importance of measuring the size and direction of inequality impacts. Recommendations were then produced based on these findings to better account for inequalities in HTA, highlighting the importance of combining a range of approaches.

CONCLUSIONS: Both companies and HTA agencies should be more proactive in accounting for health inequalities. Companies should be encouraged to provide quantitative analysis on health inequalities, while decision makers should be trained on new methods. Despite the recent rise in quantitative methods, qualitative methods remain extremely important for a ‘layered’ approach to considering health inequalities.

You may also be interested in

Peer-reviewed publication

Clinical Burden and Healthcare Resource Use of Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in England: A Linked Primary and Secondary Care Data Analysis

YHEC authors: Erin Barker, Heather Riley, Monica Garrett
Publication date: May 2026
Journal: British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (cTTP) is an ultra rarehaematological disorder. This study aimed to estimate the clinical burden, healthcareresource use (HCRU) and associated costs of cTTP in England using primary...

Peer-reviewed publication

Effects and Costs of a Group-Based Educational Intervention to Reduce Opioid Use in People with Chronic Pain: I-WOTCH RCT

YHEC authors: Joe Moss
Publication date: May 2026
Publishers: NIHR
Journal: HTA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term use of strong opioids for chronic non-cancer pain puts people at risk of serious harm. OBJECTIVES: To test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention targeting...

Peer-reviewed publication

Quantifying the Case for Prevention: Disease Burden and Cost-Effective Interventions in UK

YHEC authors: Matthew Taylor
Publication date: May 2026
Publishers: Oxford Academic
Journal: Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modifiable risks—tobacco use, poor diet, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and mental ill-health—drive substantial disease in UK. NICE evidence on preventive interventions targeting these risks and estimates of eligible populations...