Published: June 2024

Last updated: October 2025

‘Progress Is Impossible Without Change’… A Case Study To Feasibly Incorporate Environmental Sustainability In Health Technology Assessment

INTRODUCTION: Environmental sustainability and its incorporation in health technology assessment (HTA) is becoming increasingly researched globally. However, this has yet to lead to a significant impact on HTA processes. This research presents a novel case study, demonstrating how available methods can deepen the understanding of evidence-based approaches to healthcare decision making and support HTA sustainability policy development.

METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed for a digital health technology used to support primary care in the diagnosis and triage of musculoskeletal conditions. The model mapped the potential impact on the care pathway, capturing differences in resource use, including appointments, medications, diagnostic tests, surgical procedures and other non-pharmacological treatments. The model was populated from a UK perspective and captured both health-economic impact and carbon dioxide equivalents CO2e impact. Additional potential environmental impacts were then considered qualitatively as part of the evaluation.

RESULTS: The health economic modelling approach captures all stages of the patient care pathway and resource use demonstrating its practicality for simultaneously mapping out the carbon impacts. This methodological approach is reproducible, transparent and provides a standardised tool for use in future carbon, cost-comparison modelling. This would present decision makers with more complete information. There are some limitations to this approach, such as ambiguity regarding some carbon data estimates used, but still provides a more useful summary than no estimated quantification.

CONCLUSIONS: Adapting HTA will support wider efforts in health systems to reduce environmental impacts. This model can be practically applied to account for both cost and carbon data, facilitating a holistic and environmentally sustainable approach to decision making. As part of encouraging additional research into the environment, HTA agencies will need to provide ‘incentives’ for companies to undertake this additional research.

You may also be interested in

Peer-reviewed publication

Carbon Emission Impact of Semaglutide in People with Obesity in the UK Using a Disease Modelling Approach

YHEC authors: Matthew Taylor
Publication date: September 2026
Journal: PharmacoEconomics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the carbon footprint and clinical outcomes of once-weekly semaglutide in people with overweight or obesity in the UK using a disease modelling approach. METHODS: A...

Peer-reviewed publication

Comparing Statistically Reliable and Patient-Perceived Improvement Following Hip Arthroplasty: Rasch-Based and Anchor-Based Approaches

YHEC authors: Adam Smith, Damian Lewis, Stuart Mealing, Andria Joseph
Publication date: September 2026
Journal: Journal of Patient Reported Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interpreting meaningful change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for assessing hip replacement outcomes. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) is widely used, yet statistically detectable change may not...

Peer-reviewed publication

Mitigating Bias in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Estimation Due to Missing Data: A Simulation-Based Study Evaluating Imputation Methods

YHEC authors: Joe Moss, Neil Hansell, Erin Barker, Matthew Taylor
Publication date: August 2026
Publishers: MDPI
Journal: Health Economics & Policy

Abstract

Missing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) data in clinical studies risk propagating bias into health technology assessments (HTAs) and cost-utility analyses. Despite this, current National Institute for Health and Care...