Published: June 2024

Last updated: June 2024

Variation in Decision Making and Market Access Routes for Vaccines: Insights from Seven Countries

INTRODUCTION: Quick and equitable market access to vaccines is a global priority. However, market access routes for vaccines are complex and differ to those for pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, there is variation in decision making between countries due to local requirements. This work aims to increase awareness of the key elements of these pathways and the stakeholders involved in EU and non-EU countries.

METHODS: Pragmatic desk-based research was undertaken in November 2023 to explore key elements of the market access pathways for vaccines and how these differ between countries. Specifically, the countries of interest were England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United States (US), and Canada. Where available, information was extracted about the key stages and stakeholders involved in the decision-making pathway as well as details about any post-licensing monitoring, the value assessment framework used, vaccine pricing and the procurement process. In addition, examples of barriers to vaccine access were extracted. A narrative summary of the key findings and between-country differences will be presented.

RESULTS: National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) are key stakeholders in all countries explored, with varying roles. The evidence requirements differ among countries, such as Germany’s requirement for economic and epidemiological modelling. The Vaccine Monitoring Platform coordinates studies for post-authorization monitoring of vaccines across EU countries. However, England is not part of this network and uses a national agency instead. Vaccine procurement and pricing also differ (e.g. France uses individual reimbursement, England uses national tendering, and Canada uses regional tendering). There is variation within the US on vaccine pricing, depending on the healthcare provider. Barriers to vaccine access are well reported.

CONCLUSIONS: These results can influence the market access strategy of vaccine developers to ensure rapid and equitable vaccine access across countries. Several between-country differences in vaccine market access routes are identified; for example, the role of NITAGs, evidence requirements, and post-licensing monitoring processes. Barriers to vaccine access have been reported in the literature, with some organizations providing recommendations to overcome these.

You may also be interested in

Peer-reviewed publication

Reducing Opioid Use for Chronic Pain With a Group-Based Intervention: Economic Evaluation using Randomised Controlled Trial Data

YHEC authors: Joe Moss
Publication date: October 2026
Journal: Addiction

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Long-term strong opioid use for chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) represents a significant public health challenge, associated with reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and increased mortality. The...

Peer-reviewed publication

Methods in Systematic Reviews of Health Economic Evaluations in Submissions to Health Technology Assessment Agencies: How Systematic Are They, and Does This Matter?

YHEC authors: Chris Bartlett, Rachael McCool, Matthew Taylor
Publication date: October 2026
Journal: PharmacoEconomics

Abstract

Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations (SR-HEEs) are perceived as mandatory components of the health technology assessment (HTA) process in many jurisdictions. However, HTA agencies vary in how they prescribe...

Peer-reviewed publication

Commentary: Selpercatinib versus Multi-Kinase Inhibitors for Advanced Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of RET-Targeted Therapies

YHEC authors: Joe Moss, Erin Barker
Publication date: October 2026
Journal: Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

We have read with great interest the published network meta-analysis (NMA) by Wang et al. (2026) in Frontiers in Endocrinology, which synthesised available randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence to evaluate...