Published: June 2024

Last updated: June 2024

Variation in Decision Making and Market Access Routes for Vaccines: Insights from Seven Countries

INTRODUCTION: Quick and equitable market access to vaccines is a global priority. However, market access routes for vaccines are complex and differ to those for pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, there is variation in decision making between countries due to local requirements. This work aims to increase awareness of the key elements of these pathways and the stakeholders involved in EU and non-EU countries.

METHODS: Pragmatic desk-based research was undertaken in November 2023 to explore key elements of the market access pathways for vaccines and how these differ between countries. Specifically, the countries of interest were England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United States (US), and Canada. Where available, information was extracted about the key stages and stakeholders involved in the decision-making pathway as well as details about any post-licensing monitoring, the value assessment framework used, vaccine pricing and the procurement process. In addition, examples of barriers to vaccine access were extracted. A narrative summary of the key findings and between-country differences will be presented.

RESULTS: National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) are key stakeholders in all countries explored, with varying roles. The evidence requirements differ among countries, such as Germany’s requirement for economic and epidemiological modelling. The Vaccine Monitoring Platform coordinates studies for post-authorization monitoring of vaccines across EU countries. However, England is not part of this network and uses a national agency instead. Vaccine procurement and pricing also differ (e.g. France uses individual reimbursement, England uses national tendering, and Canada uses regional tendering). There is variation within the US on vaccine pricing, depending on the healthcare provider. Barriers to vaccine access are well reported.

CONCLUSIONS: These results can influence the market access strategy of vaccine developers to ensure rapid and equitable vaccine access across countries. Several between-country differences in vaccine market access routes are identified; for example, the role of NITAGs, evidence requirements, and post-licensing monitoring processes. Barriers to vaccine access have been reported in the literature, with some organizations providing recommendations to overcome these.

You may also be interested in

Peer-reviewed publication

Carbon Emission Impact of Semaglutide in People with Obesity in the UK Using a Disease Modelling Approach

YHEC authors: Matthew Taylor
Publication date: September 2026
Journal: PharmacoEconomics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the carbon footprint and clinical outcomes of once-weekly semaglutide in people with overweight or obesity in the UK using a disease modelling approach. METHODS: A...

Peer-reviewed publication

Comparing Statistically Reliable and Patient-Perceived Improvement Following Hip Arthroplasty: Rasch-Based and Anchor-Based Approaches

YHEC authors: Adam Smith, Damian Lewis, Stuart Mealing, Andria Joseph
Publication date: September 2026
Journal: Journal of Patient Reported Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interpreting meaningful change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for assessing hip replacement outcomes. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) is widely used, yet statistically detectable change may not...

Peer-reviewed publication

Mitigating Bias in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Estimation Due to Missing Data: A Simulation-Based Study Evaluating Imputation Methods

YHEC authors: Joe Moss, Neil Hansell, Erin Barker, Matthew Taylor
Publication date: August 2026
Publishers: MDPI
Journal: Health Economics & Policy

Abstract

Missing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) data in clinical studies risk propagating bias into health technology assessments (HTAs) and cost-utility analyses. Despite this, current National Institute for Health and Care...