Abstract

No abstract available

Abstract

No abstract available

Abstract

Treatment with imatinib has demonstrated high response rates and improved prognosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia. However, while the short-term response to imatinib is high, there are some concerns that the long-term response is substantially lower. Durable response with imatinib is difficult to achieve in patients with resistant disease. The use of higher doses has also been associated with increased toxicity and intolerance. Dasatinib is a new SRC–ABL-kinase inhibitor that has been developed for treating chronic myelogenous leukemia patients, across all phases of disease, who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib. This article details the existing evidence on the clinical efficacy, safety and value for money of dasatinib in the treatment of imatinib-resistant and -intolerant patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Dasatinib is associated with higher levels of response compared with high-dose imatinib. In addition, higher levels of response are associated with improved health outcomes in terms of both quality- and quantity-of-life years.

Abstract

While economic models are a useful tool to aid decision-making in healthcare, there remain several types of uncertainty associated with this method of analysis. One-way sensitivity analysis allows a reviewer to assess the impact that changes in a certain parameter will have on the model's conclusions. Sensitivity analysis can help the reviewer to determine which parameters are the key drivers of a model's results. By reporting extensive outputs from sensitivity analysis, modellers are able to consider a wide range of scenarios and, as such, can increase the level of confidence that a reviewer will have in the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis provides a useful technique to quantify the level of confidence that a decision-maker has in the conclusions of an economic evaluation.

Abstract

As more countries use HTA to inform decisions on the reimbursement of health technologies, harmonization of evidence requirements between jurisdictions has been proposed, mainly on the grounds of improved efficiency. Harmonization has the potential to avoid duplication of effort for both manufacturers and HTA bodies involved in preparing and reviewing HTA submissions for innovative technologies. However, it also carries risks of loss of local control over decisions, the application of general data standards which are not universally accepted and slowing the rate of development of innovation in the analytical disciplines supporting HTA. This study reviews the issues associated with harmonization taking into account the perspectives of the multiple stakeholders. This study draws on experiences from recent initiatives intended to promote the harmonization of HTA and experience from related fields, particularly regulatory approval of new medical technologies.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors developed a tool to assess the quality of search filters designed to retrieve records for studies with specific research designs (e.g., diagnostic studies).

METHODS: The UK InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG), a group of experienced health care information specialists, reviewed the literature to evaluate existing search filter appraisal tools and determined that existing tools were inadequate for their needs. The group held consensus meetings to develop a new filter appraisal tool consisting of a search filter appraisal checklist and a structured abstract. ISSG members tested the final checklist using three published search filters.

RESULTS: The detailed ISSG Search Filter Appraisal Checklist captures relevance criteria and methods used to develop and test search filters. The checklist includes categorical and descriptive responses and is accompanied by a structured abstract that provides a summary of key quality features of a filter.

DISCUSSION: The checklist is a comprehensive appraisal tool that can assist health sciences librarians and others in choosing search filters. The checklist reports filter design methods and search performance measures, such as sensitivity and precision. The checklist can also aid filter developers by indicating information on core methods that should be reported to help assess filter suitability. The generalizability of the checklist for non-methods filters remains to be explored.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Two main treatments exist for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Open surgical repair has been the standard treatment, but more recently endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been introduced as a less invasive technique. To compare the long-term outcomes of these, utility outcomes have been suggested to be relevant.

OBJECTIVE: To review studies comparing the utility outcomes of open repair and EVAR treatment for AAA.

DESIGN: Database search with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE covering terms relating to AAA and utility. Studies were analysed qualitatively.

RESULTS: 10 studies of AAA met the review criteria. The comparative utility scores for the different treatments varied considerably between studies. A Canadian cohort study estimated EVAR as more favorable than open repair, while randomised controlled trials reported lower utilities with EVAR, except for one month post-surgery in the EVAR 1 trial. Furthermore, after screening for AAA, patients testing positive gave similar QoL-5D scores, but worse visual analogue scores than those testing negative.

CONCLUSION: There were few studies calculating utilities in AAA, with inconsistent findings. The limited reporting of data prevents in-depth analysis to explain the differences.